Tom Lane wrote:
> Colin Wetherbee <cww(at)denterprises(dot)org> writes:
>> I just thought I'd report it here in case it wasn't supposed to
>> happen, but from what you say, it seems like it's a "feature".
>
> Well, it's more of a historical hangover. Personally I'd not have
> much problem with breaking backward compatibility on this point.
I'm not generally in the habit of making typos, so this doesn't affect
me too much.
However, IMHO and as I mentioned previously, I don't think "\timimng"
should succeed. I'll leave the rest of the discussion up to you and
the other developers, though. :)
Colin