| From: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
|---|---|
| To: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Lessons from commit fest |
| Date: | 2008-04-15 13:26:35 |
| Message-ID: | 4804AD0B.7050500@sun.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Martijn van Oosterhout napsal(a):
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 05:15:51PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>> So when/how do those discussions get resolved?
>>> [ shrug... ] You can't force ideas to happen on a schedule.
>> I need is to know if they are ideas worthy of TODO.
>
> One thing I would like is if larger more complex patches where there
> really was discussion would get a page in the wiki. For example the FSM
> data structure discussion; I read the thread but due to all the
> crossing threads I only have a have vague idea of what's actually been
> decided. It would be helpful if there was a wiki page that described
> the solution and why it is better than the others suggested.
+1
Completely agree. Each huge page should have actual proposal/design on wiki. It
helps to improve speed of review and also it will be good knowledge base about
internals.
Zdenek
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-04-15 13:29:47 | Re: Lessons from commit fest |
| Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2008-04-15 13:16:40 | Re: Sorting writes during checkpoint |