| From: | Adrian Moisey <adrian(at)careerjunction(dot)co(dot)za> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: db size |
| Date: | 2008-04-15 07:33:06 |
| Message-ID: | 48045A32.3010607@careerjunction.co.za |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Hi
>>> Now, is the bloat in the tables (which tables ?) or in the
>>> indexes (which indexes ?), or in the toast tables perhaps, or in the
>>> system catalogs or all of the above ? Or perhaps there is a
>>> long-forgotten process that got zombified while holding a huge temp
>>> table ? (not very likely, but who knows).
>>> Use pg_relation_size() and its friends to get an idea of the size
>>> of stuff.
Can anybody give me some advice on the above? I'm not sure where to
start looking or how to start looking
--
Adrian Moisey
Systems Administrator | CareerJunction | Your Future Starts Here.
Web: www.careerjunction.co.za | Email: adrian(at)careerjunction(dot)co(dot)za
Phone: +27 21 686 6820 | Mobile: +27 82 858 7830 | Fax: +27 21 686 6842
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2008-04-15 09:05:12 | Re: shared_buffers performance |
| Previous Message | Adam Gundy | 2008-04-14 22:16:41 | Re: varchar index joins not working? |