| From: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Remove lossy-operator RECHECK flag? |
| Date: | 2008-04-14 16:37:49 |
| Message-ID: | 4803885D.40409@sigaev.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> Actually, I think I figured it out. Please look over the GIST/GIN parts
> of this patch and see if they're OK with you.
Looks good, thank you.
Why don't use suggested way for GIN index over tsvector?
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-04/msg00812.php
It's nothing to cost light optimization...
> This is still WIP because I haven't touched any contrib code, but
> as far as the main backend goes I think it's ready to apply.
Patch to all contrib modules:
http://www.sigaev.ru/misc/contrib.patch.gz
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2008-04-14 16:42:09 | Re: pg_dump object sorting |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-14 16:29:36 | Lessons from commit fest |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-14 16:48:19 | Re: [HACKERS] Remove lossy-operator RECHECK flag? |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-04-14 15:04:35 | Re: Reference by output in : \d <table_name> |