Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size
Date: 2022-06-21 21:41:07
Message-ID: 4800a657-ebea-740c-5f2f-d5b096012a25@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 2022-06-21 Tu 17:25, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2022-06-21 17:11:33 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> I and a couple of colleagues have looked it over. As far as it goes the
>> json fix looks kosher to me. I'll play with it some more.
> Cool.
>
> Any chance you could look at fixing the "structure" of the generated
> expression "program". The recursive ExecEvalExpr() calls are really not ok...
>

Yes, but I don't guarantee to have a fix in time for Beta2.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2022-06-21 23:34:34 Re: Add header support to text format and matching feature
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2022-06-21 21:36:35 Re: PostgreSQL 15 Beta 2 release