Re: [PATCH] remove pg_standby

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove pg_standby
Date: 2020-11-25 09:04:12
Message-ID: 47c1a857-3e42-489d-6be3-ee229f970d0c@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2020-11-21 20:41, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 05:26:54PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 2020-10-29 03:44, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>>> diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/contrib.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/contrib.sgml
>>> index 4e833d79ef..be4292ec33 100644
>>> --- a/doc/src/sgml/contrib.sgml
>>> +++ b/doc/src/sgml/contrib.sgml
>>> @@ -199,6 +199,5 @@ pages.
>>> part of the core <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> distribution.
>>> </para>
>>> - &pgstandby;
>>> </sect1>
>>> </appendix>
>>
>> With this removal, that section becomes empty. So you probably want to
>> clean up or reorganize this a bit.
>>
>> See https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/contrib-prog.html for the context.
>
> Oops. I guess I'd write something like this. If we just remove it, then
> there'd no place to add a new server application, and "client applications"
> would be the only subsection.

I have committed the typo fix. I don't have a well-formed opinion yet
about whether all the reservations about removing pg_standby have been
addressed.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2020-11-25 09:18:24 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Previous Message Peter Smith 2020-11-25 08:56:24 Re: Enumize logical replication message actions