| From: | Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a |
| Date: | 2008-04-09 00:31:05 |
| Message-ID: | 47FC0E49.6050201@esilo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> I don't see requiring users to add -lpqtypes to use these functions as a
> problem. The idea is that the default libpq would have enough hooks
> that you could use it without modification.
>
You are correct, brain fart on my part. Not sure where my mind was at
but I scratch those commit about redhat linking in libpqtypes. Sorry
about that.
I think the hook idea would work. Have to look at composites and
arrays, they create their own result objects from scratch.
Andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-09 00:41:03 | Re: SET TRANSACTION not compliant with SQL:2003 |
| Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2008-04-09 00:30:45 | Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Chernow | 2008-04-09 00:47:38 | Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a |
| Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2008-04-09 00:30:45 | Re: [PATCHES] libpq type system 0.9a |