From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Commit Fest (was Re: Sort Refinement) |
Date: | 2008-03-21 14:48:25 |
Message-ID: | 47E3CAB9.8030603@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>>
>> Incidentally, I'm in favour of letting Heikki review his own work
>> because there's a backlog on index changes that appears to be months
>> long and he has a good chance of tackling that.
>
> Umm, I don't think there's any patches from me in the queue that need
> review. There's some discussion threads related to bitmap indexes, but
> that's all. We're definitely not going to get bitmap indexes in this
> commit fest.
>
There is your CopyReadLineText speedup, but I think there are too many
open questions on it, e.g.:
* should we change the line-end detection mode in text (non-CSV)
mode by looking for an LF preceded by an even number of
backslashes, or some similar logic?
* how do we decide when to use the memchr tests rather than char by
char tests?
* is there a more economical way to code the searcher? (although I
could live with it for now)
So I suggest we take it out of the queue for now and kick it back to you.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-03-21 15:18:41 | Re: Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1 |
Previous Message | NikhilS | 2008-03-21 14:45:43 | Re: Auto Partitioning Patch - WIP version 1 |