Re: Commit fest?

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Commit fest?
Date: 2008-03-17 16:55:05
Message-ID: 47DEA269.2050209@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>
>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> We are sucking a lot of this data down to the db on
>>> search.postgresql.org already. Does it make sense to do it there
>>> perhaps? Is there need for anything more than a unique-messageid-hit? If
>>> that's all we need, we could easily have an url like
>>> http://search.postgresql.org/search?msgid=19873987123(at)foo(dot)com redirect
>>> to the proper page on archives?
>> Agreed, we just need search to index the message-id line and we can link
>> to that easily.
>
> I would very much like such a URL as well. At a guess it would require hacking
> the tsearch parser we use for the search engine on the web site?

No, it requires hacking the indexing script, and we'll store the
messageid in it's own column in the table.

//Magnus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-03-17 16:56:58 Re: Minimum selectivity estimate for LIKE 'prefix%'
Previous Message Greg Smith 2008-03-17 16:52:27 Re: [PATCHES] [0/4] Proposal of SE-PostgreSQL patches