From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | sathiya psql <sathiya(dot)psql(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: migration of 7.4 to 8.1 |
Date: | 2008-03-12 06:33:13 |
Message-ID: | 47D77929.7030401@postnewspapers.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
sathiya psql wrote:
>> This might be a silly question, but ... why 8.1 ?
>>
>> If you're doing a major upgrade, why not go straight to 8.3? It's been
>> out long enough that there aren't any obvious nasty bugs, and there have
>> been a fair few fixes and improvements since prior versions.
>>
> Because am using Debian ETCH stable... i need to continue using this... In
> Debian ETCH stable 8.1 is only there....
I use Etch on my servers. The magic of etch-backports from backports.org
allows me to use 8.3 without messing with anything else. It works
extremely well.
All I had to do to install 8.3 was add the etch-backports line to my
/etc/apt/sources.list, run `apt-get update', then run:
apt-get -t etch-backports install postgresql-8.3
... then migrate the data to it and remove the old packages.
See backports.org for a mirror list.
> I will be installing my project in other machines where it is having DEBIAN
> ETCH STABLE, i dont want to face any problems... so only...
>
> am i right ???
Personally I'd use 8.3 from backports.org, but it's of course up to you.
--
Craig Ringer
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | sathiya psql | 2008-03-12 06:36:45 | Re: migration of 7.4 to 8.1 |
Previous Message | sathiya psql | 2008-03-12 06:29:27 | Re: migration of 7.4 to 8.1 |