Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Include Lists for Text Search

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Include Lists for Text Search
Date: 2008-03-10 12:24:08
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches

Simon Riggs wrote:
> As Greg mentions on another thread, not all patches are *intended* to be
> production quality by their authors. Many patches are shared for the
> purpose of eliciting general feedback. You yourself encourage a group
> development approach and specifically punish those people dropping
> completely "finished" code into the queue and expecting it to be
> committed as-is. 

If you post a patch that is not intended to be of production quality, it 
is best to mark it so explicitly. Then nobody can point fingers at you. 
Also, Bruce would then know not to put it in the queue of patches 
waiting for application.



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Guillaume SmetDate: 2008-03-10 12:28:59
Subject: Re: Maximum statistics target
Previous:From: C├ędric VillemainDate: 2008-03-10 10:58:37
Subject: Re: Maximum statistics target

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-03-10 12:58:09
Subject: Re: tsvector prints pointer difference as int
Previous:From: Craig RingerDate: 2008-03-10 12:16:27
Subject: Re: Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group