| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Include Lists for Text Search |
| Date: | 2008-03-10 13:31:09 |
| Message-ID: | 1205155869.4269.92.camel@ebony.site |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 08:24 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > As Greg mentions on another thread, not all patches are *intended* to be
> > production quality by their authors. Many patches are shared for the
> > purpose of eliciting general feedback. You yourself encourage a group
> > development approach and specifically punish those people dropping
> > completely "finished" code into the queue and expecting it to be
> > committed as-is.
> If you post a patch that is not intended to be of production quality, it
> is best to mark it so explicitly. Then nobody can point fingers at you.
> Also, Bruce would then know not to put it in the queue of patches
> waiting for application.
So it can be forgotten about entirely? Hmmmm.
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-03-10 13:42:43 | Re: Include Lists for Text Search |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-10 12:46:34 | Re: Maximum statistics target |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-03-10 13:42:43 | Re: Include Lists for Text Search |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-10 12:58:09 | Re: tsvector prints pointer difference as int |