Re: Unicode comment on Postgres vs Sql Server

From: Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>
To: Swaminathan Saikumar <swami(at)giveexam(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Unicode comment on Postgres vs Sql Server
Date: 2008-03-02 20:44:24
Message-ID: 47CB11A8.9000107@wildenhain.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Swaminathan Saikumar wrote:
> I am familiar with MS Sql Server & just started using Postgres.
> For storing Unicode, Sql Server uses nvarchar/char for unicode, and uses
> char/varchar for ASCII.
> Postgres has this encoding setting at the database level.
>
> I am using UTF8 Unicode for most of my data, but there is some data that
> I know for sure will be ASCII. However, this is also stored as UTF8,
> using up more space.

This is wrong - ASCII is a subset of UTF8 and therefore uses
exactly one byte for every ASCII char.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-8 for example.

>
> At first sight, it looks like the the more granular level design is
> better. Any comments? If you agree, does it make sense to add this as a
> new datatype to Postgres?

Which new datatype?

Regards
Tino

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Swaminathan Saikumar 2008-03-02 20:54:43 Re: Unicode comment on Postgres vs Sql Server
Previous Message Leif B. Kristensen 2008-03-02 20:32:05 Re: Unicode comment on Postgres vs Sql Server