| From: | Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Permanent settings |
| Date: | 2008-02-22 11:18:34 |
| Message-ID: | 47BEAF8A.8050508@wildenhain.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Magnus Hagander wrote:
...
>> Can you explain why this wouldn't be usable?
>
> Because you will end up with an ever-growing file, that will be a PITA to
> deal with. Consider it after 10k+ changes. (yes, I can see that happening.
> You know how some people use GUIs) Or 100k. The problem does not happen at
> 100 lines...
I don't think even 100k lines would be a problem. And there should be a
penalty if someone would have automated settings to be written
permanently.
> I can see the solution with a single file with them all in, but it needs to
> be able to overwrite them IMHO.
Why? If you want to strip down the file you can just postprocess it.
Either a tool or even a little sed-script could do. And you would
save the records for reference.
+1 for Aidans idea.
Regards
Tino
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2008-02-22 12:07:34 | Re: OSSP can be used in the windows environment now! |
| Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2008-02-22 10:36:38 | Full-text search default vs specified configuration |