| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default |
| Date: | 2008-02-21 19:15:43 |
| Message-ID: | 47BDCDDF.3030801@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:33:44 -0500
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>
>
>> That's not true. The public schema has public UC privs, and always
>> has had.
>>
>>
>
> This disproves my point how?
>
>
>
You stated that this user is "in theory has zero rights" here. But they
have them by intention, so where does this theory come from? If you had
said that you believed they should not have such rights I would have not
have quibbled, but that's a different matter.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-02-21 19:25:41 | Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-02-21 19:15:28 | Re: Including PL/PgSQL by default |