Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?

From: Chris <dmagick(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?
Date: 2008-02-21 05:29:37
Message-ID: 47BD0C41.5000509@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Chris" <dmagick(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>
>>> When I said "obfuscating" I meant it. I'm pretty familiar with sh scripting
>>> and I'm not even sure what the && behaviour would do.
>> It chains commands together so if the first fails the second doesn't happen.
>
> I meant in this case, not in general. That is, does it introduce a subshell?

Ah - my misunderstanding then. No idea about that one.

--
Postgresql & php tutorials
http://www.designmagick.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2008-02-21 05:30:14 Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?
Previous Message bh yuan 2008-02-21 05:13:50 Question about shared_buffers and cpu usage