From: | "Bart Degryse" <Bart(dot)Degryse(at)indicator(dot)be> |
---|---|
To: | "PostgreSQL SQL List" <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Richard Huxton" <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Function description |
Date: | 2008-02-15 10:37:47 |
Message-ID: | 47B5798B.A3DD.0030.0@indicator.be |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
>>> Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> 2008-02-15 11:15 >>>
>Dont' forget to cc: the list Bart :-)
My mistake, sorry. Normally I only reply to the list and not to the respondent's personal address.
Would that be wrong too?
>
>Bart Degryse wrote:
>> Thanks for that explanation Richard.
>> But how can I know what they repeat without having documentation.
>> I mean, how about functions like eg regexeqjoinsel, regexeqsel, reltimeeq, reltimege.
>> I can imagine they mimic some other functionality, but how can I know whichone?
>
>Well, like I said many implement operators, so they can be obviously be
>found in pg_operator:
>
>SELECT * FROM pg_operator WHERE oprcode = 'reltimeeq'::regproc;
Ok, now I see. Basically, something like this was what I was looking for.
>
>The oprleft/right/result columns hold oid numbers for types in pg_type.
>
>Casts are listed in pg_cast etc.
>
>The fine manuals detail the system catalogues in a chapter "System
>Catalogs".
>http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/catalogs.html
I will take a close look at these.
>
>To see how e.g. \dC etc work start psql with -E
>
I'm sorry, but I don't have commandline access to the database. That would
require an amount of trust and a level of competence our ICT department is incapable of.
>If it's not documented though, you need to ask two questions:
>1. Why am I using it?
Well, at this moment I'm not using any of these functions as I didn't know what
they do. You have to admit though that it would by useless to implement some
functionality myself that already exists, but that I just didn't know about because
I couldn't find it in the manual.
Now I know there's only "aliases" to be found, no "undocument treasures".
>2. Will it be there in the next version?
>
>--
> Richard Huxton
> Archonet Ltd
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2008-02-15 10:50:22 | Re: Function description |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2008-02-15 10:15:45 | Re: Function description |