Re: FW: bitemporal functionality for PostgreSQL

From: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Jeff Davis" <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FW: bitemporal functionality for PostgreSQL
Date: 2008-02-04 20:50:30
Message-ID: 47A77A96.3070800@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jeff Davis wrote:
> Also, they use "period" to mean interval, and "interval" to mean
> duration -- which is wrong, in my opinion; interval already has a well-
> defined mathematical meaning.

Agreed, but that mistake actually originates from the SQL standard. The
SQL INTERVAL data type is really a duration, so I guess they had to come
up with a new term for interval in the mathematical meaning.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2008-02-04 20:54:30 Re: Page-at-a-time Locking Considerations
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2008-02-04 20:46:26 Re: configurability of OOM killer