| From: | Peter Wilson <petew(at)yellowhawk(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Wilson <petew(at)yellowhawk(dot)co(dot)uk>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ECPG problem with 8.3 |
| Date: | 2008-01-30 13:48:54 |
| Message-ID: | 47A08046.1020902@yellowhawk.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 10:57:45AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> I'm concerned about this too. We'll at least have to call this out as
>> an incompatibility in 8.3, and it seems like a rather unnecessary step
>> backwards.
>>
>
> Given that people seem to use this feature I'm more than willing to
> implement it, although it might become a bit hackish. Given that fetch
> is not a preparable statement we can live with the slightly inconsistent
> variable handling I think.
>
> Expect a patch soon.
>
> Michael
>
I've just tested my original un-tweaked ECPG application code against
8.3RC2 and everything
compiles and runs fine - including the variable count argument.
Thanks very much Michael
Pete
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Wilson | 2008-01-30 13:52:55 | Re: postgresql book - practical or something newer? |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2008-01-30 13:42:03 | Re: postgresql book - practical or something newer? |