Re: A FAQ that needs updating?

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:01:26 -0500 (EST)
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:45:43 -0500 (EST)
>>> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>>>
>>>> One week later and this web site remains unchanged. :-(
>>>>
>>>> http://www.postgresql.org/about/press/faq
>>> Who controls the FAQ?
>> I would like to know myself. I assume Josh Berkus but am just
>> guessing. Can we just remove the last three items on that page?
>
> O.k. just so I am 100% clear :) We are talking about the /press/faq
> right? If so... IMO the following needs to happen:
>
> The press FAQ should be a section (internal ref of course) within the
> general FAQ as I am guessing there is some significant overlap.
>
> I believe that press should be replaced with the word Advocacy or maybe
> Advocacy & Press.
>
> All redundant information should be removed between the general and
> press advocacy sections.
>
> Add a section on the FAQ page for the Advocacy & Press section that
> links to the section within the general FAQ.
>
> Appropriate rewrites put in place to push all requests for the old FAQ
> to the new (and proper) one.
>
> Thoughts?

IIRC, the press FAQ is translated to lots of languages, and the general
one isn't.

That said, I agree that it's a problem since it will often be outdated...

//Magnus