Re: Election for board of directors

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum" <ads(at)pgug(dot)de>, pgeu-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Election for board of directors
Date: 2008-01-14 16:42:45
Message-ID: 478B9105.4000208@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgeu-general

Dave Page wrote:
> On 13/01/2008, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>> On 13/01/2008, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <ads(at)pgug(dot)de> wrote:

> That said, is there any reason this needs time on the schedule at all?
> We could just have issue ballot papers to people throughout the two
> days and collect them at any time. We'd just need a list to ensure
> noone gets two papers and that their ID is checked.

Not to be a stickler but it seems that the votes should have to be
verified. Perhaps you could pick one person to be a recipient of those
votes via email, even better pgp email?

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> /D
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

In response to

Browse pgeu-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-01-14 16:44:43 Re: Release Candidate of the PostgreSQL Europe association statutes
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-01-14 16:38:36 Re: Release Candidate of the PostgreSQL Europe association statutes