| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Sean Utt <sean(at)strateja(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql Materialized views |
| Date: | 2008-01-14 01:21:36 |
| Message-ID: | 478AB920.7060300@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>
> I'm not going to bother trying, because you just moved the goalposts
> (managing in a production environment vs using). And why should the
> number of DBAs matter one whit? Why should they matter more than, say
> application developers, when it comes to language level features?
Andrew don't get your knickers in a bunch. This was not an attack, I
wasn't declaring that one type of user was better than another, nor was
I moving goal posts. I was simply explaining the intent of my statement
because Sean quoted me without context.
Oh and as a note... the fact that you wonder about the worth of the
number of DBAs proves my point infinitely.
Joshua D. Drake
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-01-14 01:30:59 | Re: Postgresql Materialized views |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-01-14 01:10:38 | Re: Postgresql Materialized views |