| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Guido Neitzer <lists(at)event-s(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Experiences with extensibility |
| Date: | 2008-01-09 06:20:41 |
| Message-ID: | 478467B9.3070809@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Guido Neitzer wrote:
> On 08.01.2008, at 17:36, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>>> 2. What types of extensibility (possibly already available in
>>> other DBMSs) are currently missing in PostgreSQL?
>>
>> None that I am aware of.
>
> Easy multi-master clustering with just two machines.
That isn't really an extensibility argument. At least not in my mind.
Further I don't know of anyone that can "easily" do it. You either
suffer the possibility of catastrophic data loss (dolphins) or you
suffer guaranteed bank account drainage (Oracle), or you suffer the
willingness of Monopolies (MSSQL).
None of those equate to "easy".
Joshua D. Drake
>
> cug
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guido Neitzer | 2008-01-09 06:37:38 | Re: Experiences with extensibility |
| Previous Message | Guido Neitzer | 2008-01-09 05:59:56 | Re: Experiences with extensibility |