Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam)

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>
Cc: Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal - libpq Type System beta-0.8a (was PGparam)
Date: 2008-01-08 17:57:23
Message-ID: 4783B983.8040800@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Chernow wrote:
> Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Andrew Chernow wrote:
>>> It might be something with the attachment, who knows.
>>
>> Most probably that was the case, yes. The -hackers list is limited,
>> please use -patches to send patches. ;-)
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Markus
>>
>>
>
> Noted.
>
> In our case, its a little ambiguos whether -hackers or -patches is the
> correct place. We are really posting a proposal that happens to have
> a working implementation. We are looking for feedback and/or a
> discussion.
>
>

You should split it and send the proposal to -hackers. Ideally, you
would have had a proposal discussed before you wrote a line of code.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2008-01-08 18:11:45 Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory
Previous Message Sam Mason 2008-01-08 17:53:28 Re: VACUUM FULL out of memory