Re: Memory on 32bit machine

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Memory on 32bit machine
Date: 2008-01-08 04:56:49
Message-ID: 47830291.7060006@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Greg Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>> Certainly and iptables gives you some flexibility in connection
>> availability "before" it hits the actual database but without having
>> to jimmy the production firewall.

>
> 4) Funky tricks with things like port forwarding and filtering that you
> can't do with PostgreSQL alone, and that need to be active for people in
> the internal LAN. I recall this one time where I needed the database
> port to be different based on which of the local subnets the connection
> was coming through (it was a version migration thing). Those were some
> fun ipchains rules (yeah, that long ago) and I'd have been hard pressed
> to do that on the firewall instead without a major contortion to the
> network.

Some people won't like this but... packet shaping and bandwidth control
as well.

Joshua D. Drake

>
> --
> * Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rajaram J 2008-01-08 05:11:48 postgres dump cores
Previous Message Greg Smith 2008-01-08 04:49:23 Re: Memory on 32bit machine