Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum wrote:
> Hello all,
> i'm in the need to create a boolean datatype which returns an integer
> instead of the usual 't'/'f'. Before anyone starts to point me at
> casts: it's a lot overhead to cast some hundred occurances beside the
> source of trouble, if you forget one.
Do you really need a new datatype or just to change the output behaviour
of the inbuilt type? That should be quite easy to do in just a few lines