Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die

From: Craig James <craig_james(at)emolecules(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die
Date: 2007-12-11 16:40:14
Message-ID: 475EBD6E.9040302@emolecules.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 07:50:17AM -0800, Craig James wrote:
>>> Since I'm not a Postgres developer, perhaps one of the maintainers could
>>> update the Postgres manual. In chapter 32.9.6, it says,
>>>
>>> "To be precise, a shared library needs to be created."
>>>
>>> This should be amended to say,
>>>
>>> "To be precise, a non-threaded, shared library needs to be created."
>
>> Just before someone goes ahead and writes it (which is probably a good idea
>> in general), don't write it just like taht - because it's platform
>> dependent.
>
> I can find no such text in our documentation at all, nor any reference
> to OpenBabel. I think Craig must be looking at someone else's
> documentation.

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/xfunc-c.html#DFUNChttp://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/xfunc-c.html#DFUNC

Craig

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2007-12-11 17:02:56 Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-12-11 16:35:21 Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die