| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Fair large change to contributors (patch 3) |
| Date: | 2007-12-09 15:58:58 |
| Message-ID: | 475C10C2.6060202@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Dave Page wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 13:18 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> Hash: SHA1
>
> Amongst others, none of which I think it is fair to call 'minor'. Now
They were minor developers before :P. Keep in mind that they can be
moved and it is "easy" to add another section.
> some of those should clearly move up into the main section (though thats
> another discussion), but I think we should reconsider that title. How
> about 'Other contributors'?
I would consider Other less than Minor but I do get your point. I am not
sure if there would be better wording than the one you suggest.
Wait... how about just Contributor..
Core
Major Contributor
Hackers Em...
Contributor
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-12-09 16:04:18 | Re: PostgreSQL conferences page? |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-12-09 15:56:16 | Re: Fair large change to contributors (patch 3) |