| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Release Note Changes |
| Date: | 2007-12-08 19:00:33 |
| Message-ID: | 475AE9D1.6050906@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I am actually a little worried that companies who sponsor developers
> might some day want their company name on the release note item. I am
> glad we have not had to make that decision yet. This actually
O.k. I will bite :)
> highlights a danger of having "giving credit" be a more major part of
> the release notes in that companies could ask that they the company be
> given credit in the release notes --- something we want to avoid.
Why? If a company sponsored the feature why not mention them?
Note that I am not arguing one way or the other, but I find the
distinction between a individual who is a contributor and a company that
is a contributor interesting.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-12-08 19:48:27 | Re: Release Note Changes |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-12-08 17:46:07 | Re: Release Note Changes |