Re: pg_controldata doesn't report 64/32bit?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_controldata doesn't report 64/32bit?
Date: 2007-12-08 11:33:39
Message-ID: 475A8113.6080704@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon,

> Sounds like Josh is asking for a way to find out the things that matter
> on an architecture and compare them with the relevant parts of the
> pg_control structure. The 32/64 bit thing was probably just his
> shorthand for that. Perhaps we should document how to perform a
> portability check?
>

Pretty much. We're supporting x86 64-bit servers for Solaris now, and
we need SMF to be able to check whether it can safely run x binaries
against y data.

--Josh Berkus

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-12-08 12:01:16 Re: pg_controldata doesn't report 64/32bit?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-12-08 11:29:04 Re: buildenv.pl/buildenv.bat