Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation?
Date: 2007-12-07 06:16:08
Message-ID: 4758E528.2090507@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Tom,

> If we do want to keep credits in the SGML pages, how extensive should
> they be? I already took it on myself to remove Gene Selkov's snailmail
> address, but do we even want email addresses there? A lot of them are
> probably dead, and the ones that aren't are causing their owners to get
> extra spam, because an <email> link is about the easiest thing to scrape
> from a webpage that there could possibly be.

Historically, the only way to troubleshoot some of the contrib modules
was to e-mail the author. If people think that we've reached a standard
that everything in /contrib is now well-documented and supported by the
general community, the I suppose we don't need contact information. I'm
not so sure myself.

--Josh

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-12-07 06:21:10 Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-12-07 04:50:37 Re: [HACKERS] "distributed checkpoint"

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-12-07 06:21:10 Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation?
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-12-07 04:50:37 Re: [HACKERS] "distributed checkpoint"