Re: RAID arrays and performance

From: James Mansion <james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com>
To: Mark Mielke <mark(at)mark(dot)mielke(dot)cc>
Cc: matthew(at)flymine(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RAID arrays and performance
Date: 2007-12-04 15:55:30
Message-ID: 47557872.1000105@mansionfamily.plus.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Mark Mielke wrote:
> This assumes that you can know which pages to fetch ahead of time -
> which you do not except for sequential read of a single table.
>
Why doesn't it help to issue IO ahead-of-time requests when you are
scanning an index? You can read-ahead
in index pages, and submit requests for data pages as soon as it is
clear you'll want them. Doing so can allow
the disks and OS to relax the order in which you receive them, which may
allow you to process them while IO
continues, and it may also optimise away some seeking and settle time.
Maybe.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew 2007-12-04 16:00:37 Re: RAID arrays and performance
Previous Message James Mansion 2007-12-04 15:50:12 Re: RAID arrays and performance