Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance

From: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
To: pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance
Date: 2007-11-28 02:05:04
Message-ID: 474CCCD0.3050907@cox.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/27/07 19:35, Greg Smith wrote:
[snip]
> to you. The minute performance becomes a serious concern, you'd be much
> better off with Linux, one of the BSDs that's not hobbled by using the
> Mach kernel, or one of the more serious UNIXes like Solaris.

Wasn't there a time (2 years ago?) when PG ran pretty dog-like on SPARC?

- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA

%SYSTEM-F-FISH, my hovercraft is full of eels
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHTMzQS9HxQb37XmcRAo91AJ0d1l1LW0REaUEyVwrkhAF7u6+EYgCaA1aG
/qrqS5JebnStbMbO/QD+YA0=
=U6ta
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lew 2007-11-28 02:12:00 Re: \copy ... with null as '' csv doesn't get nulls
Previous Message Ron Johnson 2007-11-28 01:55:47 Re: Linux v.s. Mac OS-X Performance