Re: PL argument max size, and doubt

From: Martin Marques <martin(at)marquesminen(dot)com(dot)ar>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Rodrigo De León <rdeleonp(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL SQL List <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL argument max size, and doubt
Date: 2007-11-23 10:37:24
Message-ID: 4746AD64.8090209@marquesminen.com.ar
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Tom Lane escribió:
> Martin Marques <martin(at)marquesminen(dot)com(dot)ar> writes:
>> Tom Lane escribió:
>>> Martin Marques <martin(at)marquesminen(dot)com(dot)ar> writes:
>>>> I have always heard that modification queries should be EXECUTED in PL.
>>>> AFAICR.
>>> Run far away from whatever source gave you that advice...
>
>> Sorry, it was with DDL commands.
>
> That's not much better ;-). DDL commands don't have plans, so there's
> not anything that could be invalidated. I don't see any reason to use
> an EXECUTE unless there's an actual textual change in the command you
> need to execute.

Well, actually....

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-sql/2007-02/msg00214.php

See the follow-ups

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sabin Coanda 2007-11-23 11:42:50 Re: Aleatory exception - found cause
Previous Message Sabin Coanda 2007-11-23 09:26:51 Re: Aleatory exception