Re: DNS

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: DNS
Date: 2007-11-16 18:47:54
Message-ID: 473DE5DA.3030700@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 07:05:12PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> What does that actually mean?
>>
>> A well-distributed and always-up secondary? Or the master as well,
>> including a new management system?
>
> The former was what I'd offered to get permission for before.

Then my vote is yes, please. I find it unlikely that we'll find a better
DNS provider doing it for us for free :-)

//Magnus

In response to

  • Re: DNS at 2007-11-16 18:42:01 from Andrew Sullivan

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2007-11-16 18:47:58 Re: DNS (was: pgfoundry is down)
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-11-16 18:47:32 Put conova in their place