| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: DNS |
| Date: | 2007-11-16 18:05:12 |
| Message-ID: | 473DDBD8.1080702@hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 03:13:58PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> it seems like a great way to invite breakins. (Black hat: "whaddya
>> know, their DNS server is down, maybe I can inject some bogus info.")
>
> If we ever have a complete DNS outage, then we need more DNS servers. Which
> reminds me, I had promised to try to get postgresql.org on the afilias name
> server infrastructure (which, I assure you, had better _not_ ever be down).
> Are people still interested in that?
What does that actually mean?
A well-distributed and always-up secondary? Or the master as well,
including a new management system?
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-11-16 18:41:15 | Re: DNS (was: pgfoundry is down) |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-11-16 17:54:23 | Re: change to interfaces.html |