Re: work_mem and shared_buffers

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Campbell, Lance" <lance(at)uiuc(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: work_mem and shared_buffers
Date: 2007-11-09 17:56:30
Message-ID: 47349F4E.5070204@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Campbell, Lance wrote:
> Does the amount of memory allocate to work_mem get subtracted from
> shared_buffers?
>
> Example:
>
> If work_mem is 1M and there are 10 connections and shared_buffers is
> 100M then would the total be 90 M left for shared_buffers?
>
> Or does the amount of memory allocated for work_mem have nothing to do
> with shared_buffers?

No, they're completely separate.

Note that a connection can use more than work_mem of memory. For
example, if you run a query with multiple Sort or hash-nodes, each such
node allocates up to work_mem of memory.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2007-11-09 18:03:20 Re: dell versus hp
Previous Message Campbell, Lance 2007-11-09 17:49:03 work_mem and shared_buffers