Re: Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Rafael Martinez <r(dot)m(dot)guerrero(at)usit(dot)uio(dot)no>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance
Date: 2007-11-08 15:09:55
Message-ID: 473326C3.3070206@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Rafael Martinez wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> On a small table like that you could run VACUUM every few minutes
>> without much impact on performance. That should keep the table size in
>> check.
>
> Ok, we run VACUUM ANALYZE only one time a day, every night. But we would
> espect the performance to get ok again after running vacuum, and it
> doesn't. Only CLUSTER helps.

If the table is already bloated, a VACUUM won't usually shrink it. It
only makes the space available for reuse, but a sequential scan still
needs to go through a lot of pages.

CLUSTER on the other hand repacks the tuples and gets rid of all the
unused space on pages. You need to run CLUSTER or VACUUM FULL once to
shrink the relation, but after that frequent-enough VACUUMs should keep
the table size down.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rafael Martinez 2007-11-08 15:10:10 Re: Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-11-08 15:01:09 Re: Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a /