Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Possible planner bug/regression introduced in 8.2.5

From: Jakub Ouhrabka <kuba(at)comgate(dot)cz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Possible planner bug/regression introduced in 8.2.5
Date: 2007-10-29 15:27:48
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Hi Tom,

>> ...probably have some cases like that in your real application.  But I'd
>> expect 8.2.4 to be equally slow because it also contains the code that
>> is slow in that scenario.  I'm hoping to get some time today to think
>> about how that could be fixed.
> Please try the attached patch (in addition to the one I sent earlier).

I can confirm that now there is no regression between 8.2.4 and 

I've also tried your last patch but still for some queries there is long 
planning time, e.g. more than 30s on a fast machine for query with 14 
regularly JOINed tables plus 8 tables are LEFT OUTER JOINed (all normal 
joins are followed by all outer joins). All joins are constrained on 
pk/fk. Should this case run faster or is it simply too much for 
geqo=off? Shall I prepare a test case?



In response to


pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Scott BaileyDate: 2007-10-29 15:44:52
Subject: BUG #3706: ecpg regression: "MOVE FORWARD"
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-10-28 22:34:36
Subject: Re: BUG #3362: xlog corruption just after initdb on irix

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group