Re: pg_restore

From: Raymond O'Donnell <rod(at)iol(dot)ie>
To: Bob Pawley <rjpawley(at)shaw(dot)ca>
Cc: Adrian Klaver <aklaver(at)comcast(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: pg_restore
Date: 2007-10-28 23:12:55
Message-ID: 47251777.2000700@iol.ie
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 28/10/2007 22:40, Bob Pawley wrote:

> pg_dump -h localhost -d Aurel -U postgres
>
> Could you suggest a dump command that will match the restore command -
>
> pg_restore -h localhost -d PDW -U postgres aurel.sql

One thing that caught me, and I suspect may be catching you also -
somewhat confusingly, in pg_restore the -d option specifies the database
to which to restore; in pg_dump it instead causes the data to be dumped
as INSERT statements rather than COPY.

I can see why things may work this way (pg_dump always needs to be
pointed at a database, whereas pg_restore doesn't if the dump is going
to create the database)....but it can trap the unwary.

See the docs at
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/static/reference-client.html

Ray.

---------------------------------------------------------------
Raymond O'Donnell, Director of Music, Galway Cathedral, Ireland
rod(at)iol(dot)ie
---------------------------------------------------------------

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Kellerer 2007-10-28 23:19:17 Re: pg_restore
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2007-10-28 22:58:55 Re: pg_restore