Re: anoncvs.postgresql.org

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: anoncvs.postgresql.org
Date: 2007-10-21 11:50:07
Message-ID: 471B3CEF.2070706@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Here's one final reminder on this one. Consider me having given up on
ever getting these things fixed now.

//Magnus

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Still waiting on this one.. Any status update or at least a basic timeframe
> on when we can expect a status update on the project of creating a
> timeframe for doing it?
>
> //Magnus
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:02:49AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> Marc,
>>>
>>> when can we expect something to happen about these issues? They're fairly
>>> critical, IMO.
>>>
>>> (I've removed the parts that were just what's done, what's left is just the
>>> TODO list of important things)
>> Come on Marc... there is a list of todos below. Can we please see some
>> progress? (/me grumbles about the fact that he is currently documenting
>> community2)
>>
>> Joshua D. Drake
>>
>>
>>> //Magnus
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 03:22:05PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 02:34:54PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>>>> Marc,
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, wasn't the plan to move cvsup there as well? Any status on when that
>>>>> can happen?
>>>>>
>>>>> When can we expect sudo to be installed with the proper config for
>>>>> managers (incl accounts)?
>>>>>
>>>>> Finally, when can we expect some basic documentation of how the machine is
>>>>> set up? I have not documented the changes I did as stated above, since there
>>>>> is nowhere to document them yet. So please include them from the beginning.
>>>>>
>>>>> I notice the machine went into production already before we had docs - so
>>>>> it's fairly urgent now. We do have a policy of not bringing undocumented
>>>>> machines into production these days....
>>>> FYI, I've also updated the server list since it said that the new anoncvs
>>>> machine wasn't in use yet.
>>>>
>>>> Is svr4 all dead now? I think you said so - in that case, it needs to be
>>>> wiped (it can still be pinged :-P), and it needs to be removed from the
>>>> documentation (which claims it's still the master ftp site?)
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2007-10-21 20:57:29 Re: anoncvs.postgresql.org
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2007-10-16 17:23:50 Re: Mail setup broken (still/again?)