| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Stefan Schwarzer <stefan(dot)schwarzer(at)grid(dot)unep(dot)ch>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Crosstab Problems |
| Date: | 2007-10-18 18:37:59 |
| Message-ID: | 4717A807.1030209@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> so it's trying to pstrdup a null result from SPI_getvalue.
>
> Obviously it shouldn't crash, but I'm not sure what it *should* do in
> this case. Joe?
The row is pretty useless without a rowid in this context -- it seems
like the best thing to do would be to skip those rows entirely. Of
course you could argue I suppose that it ought to throw an ERROR and
bail out entirely. Maybe a good compromise would be to skip the row but
throw a NOTICE?
Joe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Crawford | 2007-10-18 18:55:15 | Abbreviation list |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-10-18 18:33:15 | Re: Re : pg_dump SERIAL and SEQUENCE |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-10-18 21:13:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Why copy_relation_data only use wal whenWALarchivingis enabled |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2007-10-18 16:36:24 | Re: Crosstab Problems |