Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: AbstractJdbc2Array - another patch

From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: Marek Lewczuk <newsy(at)lewczuk(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-jdbc <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AbstractJdbc2Array - another patch
Date: 2007-10-18 18:05:40
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Marek Lewczuk wrote:
>> 3) When determing if NULL in an array string is a null value, you need 
>> to check the server version.  Prior to 8.2 an unadorned NULL is the 
>> text "null", not an actual null value.
> See line 106 (of the attached - I'm checking, 
> whether Object[] should be used instead of primitive arrays. It also 
> used to check, whether NULL elements can be used. Now, see line 230/231 
> - at this point, I'm checking, whether element is a text "NULL" or null 
> element - it works just fine.

Perhaps that's OK.  If you asked for primitive types on an int[] array 
with a NULL value, you could want zero instead of an error trying to 
convert the String "NULL" to an int, similar to rs.getInt() on a NULL 
value.  Let's leave this for now and work on fixing/writing new tests 
and #6 and we can revisit this later.

>> 4) Shouldn't toString(PgArrayList) be PgArrayList.toString() ?
> It could be, but see line 598 (of the attached 
> - I'm using escapeString, that throws SQLException and I cannot declare 
> PgArrayList.toString() as throwing SQLException (super class declaration 
> doesn't allow for that) - I could of course catch SQLException but it 
> think it is better to stay with current implementation.

You're right, it's fine.

>> 6) I was unable to recursively retrieve multidimensional arrays as 
>> ResultSets as I thought I should be able to do (in the attached test). 
>> Shouldn't you retain an array as the base type for the top level of a 
>> multi-dimensional array and expose a dimension at a time via each 
>> ResultSet?
> You have made a mistake, please try attached ArrayTest.

Doh!  OK, now it mostly works, but there's still an issue with setting 
the basetype on a subarray to the base element type instead of an array 
type, as attached.  rs.getObject() (and metadata) are confused about 
what the correct type is.

Description: text/java (1.1 KB)

In response to


pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Mark LewisDate: 2007-10-18 18:10:14
Subject: Re: Fw: postgresql experts please help
Previous:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2007-10-18 18:03:23
Subject: Re: Fw: postgresql experts please help

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group