Re: [PATCH] Implement INSERT SET syntax

From: Gareth Palmer <gareth(at)internetnz(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement INSERT SET syntax
Date: 2019-11-21 23:24:15
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 19/11/2019, at 5:05 PM, Gareth Palmer <gareth(at)internetnz(dot)net(dot)nz> wrote:
>> Since nobody has objected to this, I'm supposing that there's general
>> consensus that that design sketch is OK, and we can move on to critiquing
>> implementation details. I took a look, and didn't like much of what I saw.

Attached is an updated patch with for_locking_clause added, test-cases
re-use existing tables and the comments and documentation have been

>> I'm setting this back to Waiting on Author.

Attachment Content-Type Size
insert-set-v4.patch application/octet-stream 15.6 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-11-22 00:13:20 Re: obsolete example
Previous Message Euler Taveira 2019-11-21 23:19:56 Re: obsolete example