>> Also, looking back at the news just added today, is "EnterpriseDB Postgres"
>> considered a "postgresql family product" or a commercial one? Maybe a
>> guidance bullet on "downstream distributions"?
> It's certainly not commercial, but yes that does seem worth clarifying.
Actually, I'd argue that it's commercial. That was what I had in mind
when I drafted the rules. For one thing, like the tools SW makers, EDB
tends to bury us under press releases and need reigning in, in a way
that OSS projects generally don't.
> It's a bit subjective. I'd be happy with any level of content from a
> single session up, as long as it includes details so people don't spend
> serious money getting somewhere only to find just a single session.
Well, we need to draw some line for PostgreSQL content. A 200-session
conference with one session which covers using PHP with PostgreSQL
alongside MySQL and DB2 really shouldn't go on the site. Maybe we
should just re-write that as "significant PostgreSQL content" and leave
it up to WWW what "significant" is?
>> Training events - should we require that they include information about the
>> cost to attend?
> Sounds reasonable.
Sure. Mind you, they usually do. We haven't had a problem with
trainers not providing enough content, just posting too frequently.
BTW, have we fixed the training events so that they stop displaying once
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2007-10-15 15:56:19|
|Subject: Re: Approval process for news/events/training is broken|
|Previous:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2007-10-15 15:36:15|
|Subject: Re: Surveys|