| From: | Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher |
| Date: | 2007-10-12 09:08:21 |
| Message-ID: | 470F3985.6080702@gmx.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> I think the best way to handle this is to have two limits.
>
> First limit attempts to autovacuum, but can be cancelled.
>
> When we hit second limit, sometime later, then autovacuum cannot be
> cancelled.
>
> That would give us a breathing space if we need it.
Sounds quite reasonable.
Best Regards
Michael Paesold
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexey Klyukin | 2007-10-12 09:39:20 | Re: Some questions about mammoth replication |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-10-12 09:03:02 | Re: Including Snapshot Info with Indexes |