| From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jan Wieck <wieck(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Date: | 2007-10-10 23:37:53 |
| Message-ID: | 470D6251.8080902@Yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 10/10/2007 12:08 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The results have nothing to do with whether the process was followed.
> We do not ignore process violations just because the outcome was OK.
Agreed. But reversing something that came out OK for no other reason
than that the process was violated? I know you don't, but some people
are asking for exactly that.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Florian Pflug | 2007-10-10 23:51:05 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-10-10 23:22:38 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Florian Pflug | 2007-10-10 23:51:05 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-10-10 23:22:38 | Re: Skytools committed without hackers discussion/review |