Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: statement caching link on jdbc page

From: Till Toenges <tt(at)kyon(dot)de>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: statement caching link on jdbc page
Date: 2007-10-06 12:48:43
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Kris Jurka wrote:
> I think this is a good idea, but I would include a link to JDBC4 as well 
> because despite our poor support it is the way of the future.


> I hoping we fold in the copy stuff so that disappears and until we have 
> some actual documentation/experience with the statement caching version, 
> I'm not sure how prominently I would like to promote it.

I reduced that to just mentioning the extras page. Or should i remove it 

> Yeah, since we don't even maintain 7.X anymore, mentioning 6.X and 0.2 
> is a little pointless.

There are two tables now, supported versions and archived versions. Is 
the split ok?


Attachment: download.html
Description: text/html (18.9 KB)

In response to


pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2007-10-07 19:48:53
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2856: Jdbc 4 connector running on JDK 1.6 should
Previous:From: Dave CramerDate: 2007-10-05 13:08:24
Subject: Re: statement caching link on jdbc page

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group