Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Prepared Statements vs. pgbouncer

From: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
To: Paul Lindner <lindner(at)inuus(dot)com>
Cc: Till Toenges <tt(at)kyon(dot)de>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Prepared Statements vs. pgbouncer
Date: 2007-10-01 21:35:47
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Paul Lindner wrote:

> For the record:
>    Please please please note that I'm only trying to solve a particular
>    problem here.  I know what I want to do is messy, ugly and a little
>    impure and flies in the face of elegant design.
>    If it helps think of what I'm proposing as akin to denormalization
>    of a beautiful schema to achieve specific goals.

I am going to suggest what I suggested early on in this thread again:

(1) Modify your copy of the JDBC driver so that the v3 protocol path 
does not use named statements or portals
(2) Deploy your modified driver into your specific environment

I don't think anything short of the "right" solution is going to be 
suitable for general purpose use.


In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Oliver JowettDate: 2007-10-01 21:46:44
Subject: Re: Prepared Statements vs. pgbouncer
Previous:From: Paul LindnerDate: 2007-10-01 21:32:37
Subject: Re: Prepared Statements vs. pgbouncer

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group