Re: invalidly encoded strings

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: invalidly encoded strings
Date: 2007-09-18 18:04:32
Message-ID: 46F01330.1090207@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Anyway, on the strength of that, these functions are definitely
> best named to stay away from the spec syntax, so +1 for your
> proposal above.
>
>
>

OK, I have committed this and the other the functional changes that
should change the encoding holes.

Catalog version bumped.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Joseph Krogh 2007-09-18 18:17:20 Re: 8.3 version of ts_headline
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-09-18 17:41:17 pgsql: Close previously open holes for invalidly encoded data to enter

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2007-09-19 01:27:33 Incorrect results from corr()
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-09-18 15:22:45 Re: invalidly encoded strings